1 So. 3d 352 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Melbourne v. State · Betts v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission · 656 So. 2d 432 - Windom v. State · 699 So. 2d 1332 - Franqui v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in Franqui , while the State’s objection was arguably insufficient to require the trial court to conduct a Neil [ 3 ] inquiry, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed Franqui’s convictions after concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in requesting the defense to provide a race-neutral reason for its peremptory challenge of the juror since it was clear that the trial court understood that the objection was made on racial grounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.