Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 SO3D 417 - State v. Calloway

State v. Calloway’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

114 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably 55 So. 3d 56 - State v. Dillard (2010), 68 So. 3d 1209 - State v. Patton (2011)

114 state decisions

1100200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · 707 So. 2d 973 - State v. Chester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact finder or to second guess the credibility determinations of the fact finder necessary to render an honest verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a the Defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.” ... Rather, the court must evaluate the evidence in a light most favorable to the state and determine whether the possible alternative hypothesis is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.