1 So. 3d 871 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Tennessee v. Street · Stringer v. State · 860 So. 2d 704 - Howell v. State · Hubbard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Article 3, Section 26 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 guarantees criminal defendants the right to cross-examine witnesses against them, but recross-examination is not allowable as a matter of right, but a matter of trial court discretion. Thus, the standard of review for a trial court’s denial of re[ ]cross-examination is abuse of discretion. Furthermore, the Mississippi Supreme Court has held: It is proper to exclude questions as to matters which were not opened up or brought out on redirect examination, or as to matters already fully covered, or discussed at length on cross-examination, where there is no claim of oversight and no reason stated why the matter was not inquired into on the cross-examination proper.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We review the trial court's rulings on the admission or exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion. An error in the admission or exclusion of evidence is not grounds for reversal unless the error affected a substantial right of a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.