Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Stew. 19

Bumpass v. Webb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1827

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1827-01-15

Assumpsit in the Circuit Court of Lauderdale county, by John Webb against Gabriel Bumpass, for money had and received, paid and advanced, &c.; general issue. Verdict and judgement for plaintiff.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1827-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1960

3 state decisions

10182718301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

JUDGE CRENSHAW

¶1delivered the opinion of the • Court.

¶2The defendant introduced the answer and exhibits as evidence, assenting that the plaintiff might have the entire benefit of them. The whole of them were then before the *20jury, and either party, at any stage of the argument, bad a right to refer to, and to read all or any part of them.

¶3Though a partner cannot maintain an action at law, against his copartner, on a transaction concerning the co-partnership, he may maintain such action for the excess which he has contributed over and above his proportion, of the joint stock.

¶4If the contract was, that each party should contribute equally to the purchase of the land, and the plaintiff in the action contributed more than his part, the excess was money paid and advanced to the defendant’s use, and recoverable in an action at law. Let the judgement be affirmed.

Judge Gayle not sitting.
/1/stew/19 · .json · Public domain