¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶2We are of opinion, that an order requesting the delivery of lumber or other specific article, and not purporting to have been for value received, or not containing any acknowledgement of a debt, is not even presumptive evidence of an indebtedness of the drawer to the payee or holder of the order. We think that on the evidence as presented by the bill of exceptions, the plaintiff ought to have recovered the value of the lumber received of him through Kennedy by the defendant.
¶3The judgement is reversed and the cause remanded.