Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Stew. 524

Thaxton v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 15, 1828

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1828-07-15

Jesse Edwards brought an action of assumpsit in the Circuit Court of Montgomery county, to recover of the ■appellant on a note as follows: “On or before the 25th December, 1825, 1 promise to pay Jesse Edwards, the just and full sum of four thousand pounds seed cotton, it being for value received of him, this 16th Octobor, 1823.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1828-07-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1882

3 state decisions

101828183018401850186018701880decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the CHIEF JUSTICE.

¶1The validity of a plea of the kind of the one demurred to, came incidentally before the Court on a former occasion, and we believe the opinion then expressed is a sound exposition of the law; but as that case went off on another point, and as the question is now' fairly presented, we have thought it best, for the purpose of putting the question entirely at rest, distinctly to state, that the plea overruled by the Court is a good plea in bar, and we expressly recognize the doctrine laid down in the Case of Lane against Kirkman, at a former term of this Court. If the defendant is notable to prove the. truth of the plea, it is no de-fence to the action that there had been no demand made by the plaintiff. It is, however, the safer way for the demand to be made before commencement of suit; if there is a refusal, it will remove all danger of the defendant’s defeating the action, by proving on the trial his readiness to perform.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

Judge Crenshaw not sitting.
/1/stew/524 · .json · Public domain