Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Stew. 62

Smith v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1827

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1827-01-15

Cobb recovered a judgement before a justice of the peace against Smith, the maker, and Fortner, the endorser, of a promissory note; they appealed to Madison county Court, and there by leave of the Court, Cobb dismissed the suit as to Fortner. The County Court gave judgement against Smith and Hill, his security in the appeal bond.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1918

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1827-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

JUDGE SAFFOLD

¶1delivered the opinion of the majority of the Court.

¶2The maker and endorser cannot be joined in the same action at law. Smith and Fortner vere compelled to submit to the illegal judgement of the justice, or remove the case to an appellate Court. The appellate tribunal is directed by statute to try an appeal from the judgement oí a justice of the peace, according to the justice and equity of the case, without regarding any defect in the warrant, capias, or summons, or other proceedings of the justice. 1 conceive that the intention of ..his statute was to cure such defects, or irregularities in the proceedings of justices, as do not affect the essential rights of the parties; not to sanction a misjoinder of parties. It is true, the misjoinder here was corrected in the County Court, but it was at an expense to one of the defendants, perhaps equal to the amount in controversy. It is the opinion of the majority of the Court, that the judgement must be reversed.

The Chief Justioe not sitting.
/1/stew/62 · .json · Public domain