Curry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Kotteakos v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Latimer v. Stainer · Geesa v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“abduct[ed] Jetterson Williams ... without his consent, with intent to prevent his liberation by using and threatening to use deadly force namely, a firearm, on [Williams] and with intent to inflict bodily injury on [Williams] and to terrorize [Williams] and to violate and abuse [Williams] sexually.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curry v. State“adequately describe the particular offense for which [Curry] was tried.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curry v. State“must be proven as alleged, even though needlessly stated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.