Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 SW3D 261 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 115th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Renshaw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court held that proof oí the prior misdemeanor D.W.I. convictions necessary to raise the alleged primary offense to a felony was jurisdictional. In order to successfully prosecute [a] defendant for felony D.W.I., this Court held that the State was required to prove two prior D.W.I. convictions and that the offenses were committed within ten years of the date of trial for the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “committed within 10 years before the date on which the offense for which [Smith] is being tried was committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.