State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · White v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial attorney’s representing a defendant ... in a postconviction motion in which the claim is ineffective assistance of trial counsel creates an inherent conflict of interest for the attorney.”). Thus, should Onate decide to pursue a Rule 24.035 motion in the future, it shall not be deemed successive as a result of the plea court’s effort to convert his”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Onate“is limited to consideration of the claim that federal constitutional rights have been infringed when the lawyer acting for the accused on appeal has been ineffective by constitutional standards”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.