Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 S.W.3d 687 - Fields v. State

Fields v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Huizar v. State (2000), Ex Parte Taylor (2001)

31 state decisions

240199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Geesa v. State · Fields v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... evidence may be offered by the state and the defendant as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including but not limited to ... evidence of an extraneous crime or bad act that is shown beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence to have been committed by the defendant or for which he could be held criminally responsible....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[EJvidence [of extraneous bad acts and offenses] may not be considered in assessing punishment until the fact-finder is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that [such acts and offenses] are attributable to the defendant, [emphasis supplied] Once this requirement is met, the fact-finder may use the evidence however it chooses in assessing punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “1) Does a defendant who does not request an instruction on the definition of "reasonable doubt” at punishment waive any error on appeal? 2) Must a trial court instruct the jury on the definition of "reasonable doubt” at punishment even in the absence of a request for such an instruction?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.