Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 SW3D 689 - Hardeman v. State

Hardeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Manuel v. State · Issa v. State · Pearson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we explained in Pearson, it is immaterial that the presentation of the evidence occurred before the actual words of adjudication. Hardeman had the opportunity to present evidence during the proceedings, and that is all that is required. Therefore, Hardeman cannot show that counsel erred by fading to object nor can he show he was harmed by counsel’s failure to object.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Contrary to Hardeman’s argument, Issa does not stand for the absolute right to a separate hearing. Instead, it requires the defendant to have the opportunity to present evidence in mitigation of punishment if not afforded during adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.