Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Thomp. & Cook 235

Burlew v. Hubbell

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1873

New York Supreme Court · decided 1873-06-15

This action is brought to recover upon a promissory note, alleged to have been made by the defendant and one William Fisk, dated April 4, 1867, payable one year after date, for 8250. The defendant by his answer denies the complaint. The cause was tried at the Tompkins circuit in January, 1869, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for 8281.57. The defendant had loaned to one Bement 8300 to pay his commutation on being drafted into the army.

Decided 1873-06-15

Parker, J.

¶1I concur in the result, upon the ground that error occurred upon the trial in the exclusion of evidence.

¶2Also, because there is such preponderance of evidence in favor of the defendant as brings this case within the exception from the general rule, that where there is conflict in the evidence upon a fact, the court will not overrule the finding of the jury. Here the evidence for the plaintiff is so slight, and so strong for the defendant, “as to show passion, prejudice or inattention to their duty,” on the part of the jury, which brings the case within the well-recognized exception to the general rule above referred to. Cothran v. Collins, 29 How. 155-170.

¶3Order affinned.

/1/thompcook/235 · .json · Public domain