¶1The deposition cannot be read. -The objections are, that it is in the hand-writing of the party’s attorney,, and taken by a Justice of the Peace, interested in the cause. The authorities cited embrace cases where depositions were taken legally, though-not in the causes pending. By the decease of the deponents they obtained efficacy under the ge*450neral principle of constituting the best evidence which could be produced. But here the deposition is illegally taken. The decease of the deponent cannot render that valid which was intrinsically void. It would be setting aside the Chancery process of taking depositions in perpetuara rei memoriam, to sanction the admission of depositions taken otherwise than agreeably to the statute.
1 Tyl. 449
Johnson v. Clark
Decided July 15, 1802
Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1802-07-15
<p>A deposition illegally taken cannot be read after the deponent’s decease, upon the principle that it is the best evidence which can now be produced.</p>
Decided 1802-07-15