¶1(dissenting).
¶2I agree that the Board of County Commissioners “cannot fix the salary so low as to amount to destruction of the office or create a situation where no competent person would perform the duties of the office for that compensation,” and that “an express showing of bad motive is” not necessary. Fixing the salary of the county attorney for Grand County at $10.00 per year is no compensation at all and could have no other effect than to destroy the office or make it so that no competent person would perform the duties of that office for that sum. It seems clear that such salary would be no inducement to a competent person to accept the office and perform the duties thereof. This case is distinguishable from Butler v. Williams, 207 Cal. 732, 279 P. 992, in that there the salary was fixed at $10.00 per month, twelve' times as much as here, and the term of office covered a period from 1927 to 1931 when the value of a dollar was much greater than now.
¶3The office of county attorney is created by express constitutional provision,
¶4Though the county attorney is not required to be admitted to the bar, still it was the duty of the board of county commissioners to make his compensation sufficient to induce a competent person to accept the office and perform the duties thereof efficiently. If the salary was fixed so low because they do not expect competent services, then their purpose in fixing it so low is to destroy the office and not be bothered with such an officer. It is not material here whether this plaintiff efficiently performed any services or not. It was the board’s duty to fix reasonable compensation for the services required of that office so that the office would perform its proper functions, and not to reduce the compensation so low that no services could be expected therefrom. The latter would have the effect of destroying the office, which the law forbids the board to do.
¶5Grand County has an assessed valuation of $4,976,689 and a population of about 2000 people. Even assuming that its population is exceedingly law abiding and its county business is unusually small, a reading of the duties of the county attorney makes it very clear that compensation for the discharge of the duties of that office would amount to many times the nominal sum allowed. There are bound to be some arrests' made, a lot of claims presented to the county and much advice and some litigation over claims against the' county which he should attend to. I think it entirely outside of the bounds of reason to hold that $10.00 per year is any compensation for the services required, and that such a salary-could have any other effect than to destroy the office and render it incapable of being of any value to the county.
¶6. Constitution of Utah Article VIII, § 10.
¶7. Sec. 17-18-1, U.C.A.1953 and 55-10-12, U.C.A.1953.
¶8. Sec. 17-18-2, U.C.A.1953.
¶9.' Sec. 17-18-3, U.C.A.1953.
¶10. Sec.-17-24-13, U.C.A.1953.
¶11. Sec.. 78-30-13, U.C.A.1953.
¶12. Sec. 77-12-1, U.C.A.1953.
¶13. Sec. 7-1-23 and 24, U.C.A.1953.
¶14. Sec. 77-60-2, U.C.A.1953.
¶15. Sec. 61-1-27, U.C.A.1953.
¶16. Sec. 26-4-8 and 9, U.C.A:1953 and Sec. 77-58-22, U.C.A.1953.
¶17. Sec. 30-3-1, U.C.A.1953.
¶18. Sec. 78-46-21, U.C.A.1953.
¶19. Sec. 20-13-11, U.C.A.1953.
¶20. Sec. 20-14-14, U.C.A.1953.
¶21. Sec. 20-14-23. U.C.A.1953.
¶22. Sec. 21-5-7, U.C.A.1953.
¶23. Sec. 17-5-12, U.C.A.1953.
¶24. Sec. 35-1-32 and 101, U.C.A.1953.
¶25. Sec. 77-58-20 and 21, U.C.A.1953.
¶26. Sec. 39-1-50. U.C.A.1953..
¶27. Sec. 77-4-15, U.C.A.1953.
¶28. Sec. 73-2-13, U.C.A.1953.
¶29. Sec. 59-5-35, U.C.A.1953.
¶30. Sec. 59-9-9 and 10, U.C.A.1953.
¶31. See. 13-2-17, -U.C.A.1953.
¶32. Sec. 50-1-9, U.C.A.1953.