Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Va. 34

Smith v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 15, 1820

Court of Appeals of Virginia · decided 1820-04-15

Smith brought an attachment against the estate of Pearce an absconding debtor. Pearce not appearing to defend the suit, Smith’s counsel moved the court for an order of sale of the attached effects; and that the amount of Smith’s claim should be paid him. And while the motion was before the court, counsel for Pearce offered special b^il, and filed a plea.

Decided 1820-04-15

ROANE, Judge.

¶1The court is of opinion, that the judgment of the Superior court *798of law is erroneous in this, that the bond given on suing out the attachment in the proceedings mentioned, was not so imperfect, as to authorise the judgment quashing the said attachment. That judgment is therefore reversed with costs.

¶2And this court proceeding to give such judgment, as the Superior court ' of law should have given, is farther of opinion, that the Judgment of the county court, is also erroneous, in not permitting the ap-pellee to give special bail, and plead to issue, as he offered to do.

¶3That judgment is therefore also reversed with costs; and the cause is remanded, with directions, to permit the appellee to give special bail, if the same shall be offered; and, that the cause be proceeded in, to a final judgment.

/1/va/34 · .json · Public domain