Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 Va. App. 153 - Jensen Press v. Ale

1 Va. App. 153 - Jensen Press v. Ale’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 28 Va. App. 662 - Allen & Rocks, Inc. v. Briggs (1998), 15 Va. App. 710 - Lynchburg Foundry Co. v. Goad (1993)

25 state decisions

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marval Poultry Co., Inc. v. Johnson · McCaskey v. Patrick Henry Hospital · Sun Oil Co. v. Lawrence · Daniel Construction Co. v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As long as necessary after an accident, the employer shall furnish or cause to be furnished, free of charge to the injured employee, a physician ... and such other necessary medical attention.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the [Workers’ Compensation Commission may] assess an employer who has defended any proceeding without reasonable grounds the whole costs of the proceedings, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. Assessment of costs and attorney’s fee is not required in every defense of a proceeding without reasonable grounds. Assessment is left to the sound discretion of the Commission. We will not disturb the administrative assessment of costs or attorney’s fees unless there is an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A long-held principle of the . . . Commission ... is that medical management of the [employee] is to be directed by the treating physician, not by an employer’s representative. “[N] either the employer nor its insurance carrier may limit the treating physician in the medical specialist, or treating facilities to which the [employee] may be referred for treatment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.