1 Wash. App. 527 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1975
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 25 Wash. 2d 778 - Mosher v. Mosher · 44 Wash. 2d 222 - Gordon v. Gordon · 43 Wash. 2d 81 - Paulson v. Higgins · 64 Wash. 2d 283 - McNair v. McNair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Need in this sense does not necessarily mean destitution or poverty but it does mean an absence of funds and a lack of ability to get them without extreme hardship.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We must either enforce the rule or abandon it. Its necessity has a long background of experience, and it was promulgated in aid of expeditious and orderly appellate procedure.” If there is to be a rule, there must be a point at which failure, to comply therewith can no longer be corrected. That point is the filing of respondent’s brief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pegg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.