1 Wash. App. 94 - Zukowsky v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Beck v. Dye · 76 Wash. 2d 398 - Johnston v. Ohls · 62 Wash. 2d 351 - Horner v. NORTHERN PAC. ETC. HOSP., INC. · 66 Wash. 2d 496 - Bauman v. Complita · 58 Wash. 2d 106 - Wise v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In no sense of the word can it be said that the defendant's teen-age son was "under the influence of the event." He was neither a witness nor a non-witness participant. He was so far removed from the event that he had to inquire subsequently as to what transpired. The court properly refused to admit the declarant's statement through another witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Well, that doesn't surprise me. That happened twice before.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.