1 Wend. 30
Decided May 15, 1828
New York Supreme Court · decided 1828-05-15
To an action of assumpsit on a promjSSOry note, the defendants plead a joint plea of the general J _ . _ ... . * issue, and separate pleas of discharge, under the act to abolish imprisonment for debt in certain cases. The plaintiff, by replication, took issue upon the pleas of discharge. The jury found for the plaintiff on the first issue, and for the defoudants on the second. A motion is now made for the costs of the special pleas, and of the trial of the same.
Decided 1828-05-15
¶1By the Court,
¶2The defendants are entitled to the costs of the verdict in their favor on the pleas of discharge, but not to an allowance for the pleas. The plaintiff might have confessed the pleas, and taken judgment for future effects; he is, therefore, not chargeable with the costs of putting in those pleas: but having denied the pleas, and put the defendants to the expense of a trial, he is responsible for the costs of the verdict. (See Germain v. Dakin, I Cowen, 207.)