Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Wend. 317

Miller v. Holbrook

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1828

New York Supreme Court · decided 1828-10-15

The declaration was in assumpsit on a promissory note for $1093, and also contained a count for goods sold and delivered. Plea, the general issue.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1828-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1899

7 state decisions

2018281830184018501860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

¶2The bill of exceptions is frivolous, and the plaintiffs are entitled to judgment. In Keating and Price, the defendant was allowed to avail himself of an agreement, such as is set up here; but it is to be presumed, that in that case it appeared that the promise to enlarge the time of performance, was founded on a good and sufficient consideration. None such existed in this case. The only consideration was the promise of the defendant to pay a portion of a greater sum when it should fall due, when already, he was under a legal obligation to pay the whole.

/1/wend/317 · .json · Public domain