Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Wend. 66

Ex parte Chipman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1828

New York Supreme Court · decided 1828-08-15

The relator resides at Crown Point, in the county of Essex. On the 15th of May last, he left home for Albany, for *6 purpose of making sale of his property at Crown Point. Previous to his departure, the object of his journey was cornmunicated to his neighbors, and was generally understood, He publicly took his departure in a canal boat, proceeded to Albany, and returned in the same boat within ten days.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1889

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1828-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1By the Court,

Woodworth, J.

¶2The attachment must be superseded. The debtor had not departed from the state, nor was he concealed within it, with intent to defraud his creditors, or to avoid arrest, in which cases only can this process issue. His departure from his home was public, and its object notoriously known. On the merits, therefore, the motion must be granted. It is unnecessary to express an opinion as to the regularity of the proceedings, but, had it been necessary, the court probably would have directed a supersedeas on this ground. The affidavits are defective, and it may well be doubted whether an officer, entrusted with the power of issuing this summary process, ought to receive affidavits of the concealment or departure of a debtor, taken *67before another officer; whether he ought not personally to take the proof, and examine the witnesses himself.

¶3Motion granted.

/1/wend/66 · .json · Public domain