Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Wend. 74

Plumb v. Lyman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1828

New York Supreme Court · decided 1828-08-15

The plaintiff recovered a verdict in a cause in which he was entitled to only common pleas costs; and in making up his bill, he charged supreme court costs for services incidental to a case made by the defendant for-a new trial, making a difference of about $20in the amount. ■ The notice of taxation was defective, the day of taxation being left in blank.

Decided 1828-08-15

¶1By the Coiirt,

'Woodworth, J.

¶2The plaintiff being entitled only to'common pleas costs, has no right to tax the defendant with supreme court costs in consequence of a case made, or other incidental services in the progress of the suit. The same rate of charging must be preserved throughout. The costs having been taxed on á defective notice, a retaxation is ordered at the expense of the plaintiff, and the motion is granted, with cbsts.

/1/wend/74 · .json · Public domain