Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Wright 368

Wilkinson v. Daniel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1833

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1833-08-15

The case below was assumpsit on the common counts. Plea, non assumpsit, and notice of offset. It appeared by a bill of exceptions, that when the cause was called for trial, there were no pleadings on file, and the defendant’s witnesses 369] *being absent, he objected to going on without the pleading and issue, but agreed that a declaration had been filed iiz assumpsit, to which there had been put in the general issue, with notice of setoff.

Decided 1833-08-15

BY THE COURT.

¶1There was no issue here to try, and the court below erred m ordering the cause on to trial without; the verdict is a. nullity; 5 O. 277.

¶2The court were also in error in refusing the motion in arrest, because not filed within its rule. Our courts have power only to make rules not repugnant to the law (29 O. I. 73); and the law provides (29 O. L. 72) that motions for new trial shall be first made, and if denied, the defendant may then move in arrest of judgment. In this case, the new trial was not denied until the second day after the verdict, and the defendant could not before move in arrest, without waiving his motion for a new trial, or violating the law; the rule must have been adopted inadvertently; it is of no effect when used to contravene the law.

¶3The* judgment is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded to be reinstated and proceeded in.

/1/wright/368 · .json · Public domain