Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Wright 614

Wright v. Munger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1834

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1834-06-15

Munger having sued Wright before a justice of the peace for a militia fine, appealed to the Com*mon Pleas from the justice’s judgment against him. He [615 declared in the Common Pleas upon a sentence of a court of inquiry for “ a penalty, forfeiture, ox fine of $1.75,” which was afterwards “by the court of appeals adjudged to be confirmed,” and made proferí of the records of the courts of inquiry and of appeals. Issue was joined on nil debet.

Decided 1834-06-15

WRIGHT, J.

¶1In political life it has sometimes been held that accusation is evidence of guilt, unless the accused prove himself innocent. The 39th section of the militia law is the first provision we have met with, which carries that principle into courts of justice. The express terms of the section confine it to justices of the peace. *636We cannot by construction extend it to embrace the Courts of Common Pleas, and therefore need not consider its effects further. The 616] *papers relied upon as records, neither show a fine in this case to have been assessed by the court of inquiry, or confirmed by the court of appeals. These facts are set forth in the declaration as part of the plaintiff’s right to recover in the Court of Common Pleas. They were essential to the title, and therefore to be proved. The plaintiff exhibited no proof of these facts, and could not, in law, recover. The proceedings in the court, since entering the appeal from the justice, are reversed.

COLLETT, J. dissented.

¶2[This is later than Wright v. Munger, 5 O. 441.]

/1/wright/614 · .json · Public domain