Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 A3D 435 - State v. Marsich

State v. Marsich’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter · State v. Patriarca · State v. Levitt · State v. Bettencourt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen [the] statute expresses a clear and unambiguous meaning, the task of interpretation is at an end and this [C]ourt will apply the plain and ordinary meaning of the words set forth in the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Double Jeopardy Clause protects an accused from being 'twice put in jeopardy,' a term that has been construed as protecting a criminal defendant from multiple trials for the same offense[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the task of interpretation is at an end and this [C]ourt will apply the plain and ordinary meaning of the words set forth in the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.