¶1Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. The allegedly improper exclusion of expert testimony need not be considered since the proof establishes that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of fact. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 535.]
10 A.D.2d 619
Murray v. Emsof Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 16, 1960
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1960-02-16
Decided 1960-02-16