Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 AD2D 855 - Kimmel v. Solow

Kimmel v. Solow’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1969
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Craft · Bernardine v. City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"There was no testimony in open court by the doctor who treated respondent or by the doctors who examined her; in lieu thereof the doctors' reports were received in evidence pursuant to the consent of the parties. There was no direct issue of the doctors' credibility to be determined by the trier of the facts. In our opinion, the evidence did not require or justify findings that the accident was the competent producing cause of all the conditions testified to by respondent and that such conditions were permanent."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.