¶1-Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, so as to stay the action until the termination of the separation suit between the parties. Where a determination in one action will dispose of the controversy in another, the latter should be stayed (3 CarmodyWait, New York Practice, p. 36). A judgment in the wife’s favor in the separation suit would dispose of all the issues raised in this action (Garvin v. Garvin, 306 N. Y. 118; Presbrey v. Presbrey, 6- A D 2d 477, affd. 8 N Y 2d 797). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and Stevens, JJ.
10 A.D.2d 937
Hunter v. Hunter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 24, 1960
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1960-05-24
Relies on Garvin v. Garvin
Decided 1960-05-24