¶1We think the proper construction *339of the statutes relating to the compensation of witnesses is, that the witness is entitled to one compensation only-, although summoned by both parties.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
10 Ala. 338
Renfro v. Kelly
Decided June 15, 1846
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1846-06-15
Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Macon. MotioN, by Kelly, to direct the clerk to retax the costs of witnesses in this cause. It appeared that certain witnesses were summoned by both parties, and claimed compensation for, and proved their attendance against both. The clerk taxed the attendance as proved m the bill of costs.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1851
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1846-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →