Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ariz. App. 394 - State v. James

10 Ariz. App. 394 - State v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The magistrate shall insert a direction in the warrant that it be served in the day time, unless the affidavits are positive that the property is on the person of the party, or in the place to be searched, in which case he may insert a direction that the warrant be served at any time of the day or night.” (Emphasis added.) [Note: § 13-1447 was amended in 1970. See A.R.S. § 13-1447 (Supp. 1971-72)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.