Washington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1996
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bidgood v. State ex rel. Eyman · State Ex Rel. Pontius v. Rigg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"IT IS THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF THE COURT, that the defendant be incarcerated in the Arizona State Prison, at Florence, Arizona for a term of not less than Four (4) years, nor more than Five (5) years, to run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Cause No. 46761 of this Court, and this sentence shall begin as of this date. * * *"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State“"The term of imprisonment fixed by the sentence commences to run only upon actual delivery of defendant at the place of imprisonment, or from the time fixed by the court as the time when the term of imprisonment begins." (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State“"* * * it is beyond the power of the court to date the sentence to begin before imprisonment * * * and even before the crime was committed * * *". 24 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1581b.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.