Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Backes 201 - Jankowitz v. Morristown

Jankowitz v. Morristown’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1965
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brogan v. National Surety Co. · Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co. · Franzen v. Southern Surety Co. · Johnson v. Starrett · Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Southern Surety Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thorne personally manned the machine and did the work. The compensation was $30 a shift of ten hours. He performed labor; the bulldozer was a means. He is entitled to a lien. At times when Thorne was through working, the contractor's employees used the bulldozer. There is no lien for the use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.