McCready v. . Lindenborn’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably New York Life Ins Co v. Viglas (1936), Hermitage Co. v. Levine (1928)
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedMcCready v. Lindenborn
Relationships
Relies on Howard v. . Daly · Michaels v. . Fishel · Nichols v. Scranton Steel Co. · William Wharton, Jr., & Co. v. Winch · Hall v. . Gould
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a recovery of all the damages in advance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“when the parties by their contract provide for the consequences of a breach, lay down a rule to admeasure the damages[,] and agree when they are to be paid, the remedy thus provided must be exclusively followed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was at liberty to allow the causes of action for monthly deficiency to accumulate, and to recover upon several at the same time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.