In Re Erwin’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2018
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1302 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325
Relies on Tenney v. Terry · Johnson v. Seely (In Re Seely) · Matter of Cook · In Re Jenkins · In Re Leal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he clear language requiring the trustee to be 'heard' concerning confirmation leads to the inescapable conclusion that the trustee is a 'party in interest' with standing to object to confirmation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Schweiger · Andrews v. Loheit
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.