¶1Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
¶2On the trial, defendants called one of plaintiffs as a witness; after his examination in chief, plaintiffs’ counsel proposed to examine the witness generally as to the matters in issue. To this the defendants objected, and the objection was sustained by the Court, to which plaintiffs excepted.
¶3The ruling of the Court was clearly erroneous. The Practice Act (§ 421) provides : “ A party examined by an adverse party, as in this chapter provided, may be examined on his own behalf in respect to any matter pertinent to the issue. But if he testifies to any new matter not responsive to the inquiries put to him by the adverse party, or necessary to explain or qualify his answer thereto, or to discharge, when his answer would charge himself, such adverse party may offer himself as a witness on his own behalf in respect to such new matter, and shall be so received.”
¶4Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.