Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 Cal. 313

People v. Judd

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858

California Supreme Court · decided 1858-07-01

The indictment in this case is as follows: “The People of the State of California v. William Judd, Eli Judd, and-Walker.—State of California: In the Court of Sessions of the County of Pel Norte—Special Term, A. P. 1858.— The grand jury of the county of Del Eorte, by this indictment, accuse William Judd, Eli Judd, and-Walker, the defendants, of the crime of murder, committed as follows: “The said William Judd, Eli Judd, and-Walker, on the second day of September, a. d. 1857,…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1941

5 state decisions

201858186018701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

¶1Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.

¶2The defendants were indicted for the crime of murder, alleged to have been committed by them on the second of September, 1857, by “shooting and wounding” one Rothenheim through the body with a leaden bullet, discharged from a rifle, “ of which wound he then and there died.” To the indictment the defendants demurred, on several grounds, but relied upon two : first, that it does not state on what part of the body of the deceased the wound was inflicted; and, second, that it does not allege the wound was mortal. The Court sustained the demurrer, and the People appealed.

¶3The first ground relied upon is answered by the decision of this Court in the case of The People v. Steventon, (9 Cal., 273,) *315where it was held that the objection taken goes to the form, rather than to the substance of the indictment.

¶4The second ground relied upon is frivolous. The allegation that the deceased at the time died of the wound inflicted, is a sufficient statement that the wound was mortal.

¶5The judgment sustaining the demurrer is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to proceed and try the defendants upon the indictment.

/10/cal/313 · .json · Public domain