Raggio v. Mallory’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently June 1968 · most notably Nichols v. Mitchell (1948), 21 Cal. 2d 145 - Leupe v. Leupe (1942)
71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co. · 118 Cal. App. 635 - Soda v. Marriott · 132 Cal. App. 307 - Scandalis v. Jenny · Studer v. Southern Pacific Co. · Dullanty v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing the evidence on such an appeal all conflicts must be resolved in favor of the respondent, and all legitimate and reasonable inferences indulged in to uphold the verdict if possible. It is an elementary, but often overlooked, principle of law that when a verdict is attacked as being unsupported, the power of the appellate court begins and ends with a determination as to whether there is any substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, which will support the conclusion reached by the jury. When two or more inferences can be reasonably deduced from the facts, the reviewing court is without power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. Wright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.