10 Cal. 3d 21 - In Re Law’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 142 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 13 Cal. 3d 867 - People v. Coleman (1975), 15 Cal. 3d 248 - Johnson v. Superior Court (1975)
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 142 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · 6 Cal. 3d 628 - People v. Anderson · 3 Cal. 3d 16 - In Re William M. · 8 Cal. 3d 451 - People v. Vickers · 8 Cal. 3d 470 - In Re Prewitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““MR. ZINMAN: I have nothing further. “MR. IDEMAN: I have nothing further. “People rest. “THE COURT: Anything from the defendant? “MR. ZINMAN: May I have just one moment? “Nothing, your Honor. “THE COURT: The Court finds the defendant definitely is in violation of the terms and conditions of his probation. Probation will remain revoked. “THE COURT: Are you ready for sentence at this time or do you want the matter of sentencing to go over a few days? “MR. ZINMAN: Could it go till the 13th, your Honor? “THE COURT: No. I won’t put it till the 13th. “MR. ZINMAN: That’s the date of the arraignment in the State Court case. “THE COURT: I don’t care about that. I am going to dispose of this case before then “I will put it over several days but not till the 13th. “He has actually been sentenced by the Court. It’s merely a matter of ordering the sentence into execution but I will put it over a few days, if that’s your desire. Otherwise, I will proceed at this time. “MR. ZINMAN; May I have just a moment, please? “THE COURT: Yes. “MR. IDEMAN: Your Honor, is he on a no-bail warrant on this case at this time? “THE COURT: I am sure he is. Probation was revoked and he was remanded. “Mr. ZINMAN: We are ready to proceed at this time, your Honor. “THE COURT: All right. In this matter, the defendant was heretofore placed on probation on certain terms and conditions. “He was originally sentenced to the state prison for the term prescribed by law. The execution of that sentence was suspended under ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The constitutional provision, although it first states that `All persons' shall be bailable, then *Page 931 makes an exception `for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption [is] great.' The phrase `the proof is evident or the presumption [is] great' can be relevant only as a limitation on the bailable nature of a charged but unproven capital offense; otherwise the proof and presumption would have been conclusively and finally established. The provision thus purports to deal not with all persons in an unlimited sense but rather with all persons charged with criminal offenses as only then does the whole of the language have relevancy. We have heretofore stated that the purpose served by the provision was `fixing bail before trial.' ( People v. Anderson (1972) 6 Cal.3d 628 , 657, fn. 45. . . .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent““A ‘parole hold’ occurs when a parole agent or other representative of the [Adult] Authority causes a parolee to be restrained in custody independent of any action by the decision-making component of the Authority. The situation occurs (1) when the parole agent believes that the parolee has violated a condition of parole, [or] (2) when the parolee has been arrested on a new criminal charge — a prima facie violation of parole ... Common to [both of these] situations is the power of the agent to have the parolee restrained merely by exercising his authority to take the parolee into custody and book him into a local jail or, in the event he is already in jail, prevent him from being released on bail.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.