Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Cal. App. 553 - Cox v. Hughes

10 Cal. App. 553 - Cox v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 1970
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 1970

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

8019091910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-York · In re the Estate of Garcelon · Mallin v. Wenham · Smith v. Atkins · Norton v. Whitehead

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A person has the same right to assign his wages as he has to mortgage his homestead or to mortgage personal property that is exempt from execution. If he does not choose to avail himself of the liberal exemption which the statute provides, the courts cannot interfere in his behalf. “It is universally held, as stated by Greenhood on Public Policy, that: ‘The power of the courts to declare a contract void for being in contravention of sound public policy is a very delicate and undefined power and like the power to declare a statute unconstitutional, should be exercised only in cases free from doubt.’ “Before a court should declare a contract not malum in se opposed to sound public policy, it must be entirely satisfied that the public will be substantially benefited and that such advantage is not merely theoretical or problematical.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.