10 Cal. App. 4th 13 - People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2010
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler · 47 Cal. 3d 1194 - People v. Johnson · 3 Cal. 4th 195 - People v. Pride
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In ruling on a Wheeler motion, a trial court has no `range' of options. If the prosecutor's explanation is disbelieved then the court must grant the motion and begin jury selection anew. ( People v. Wheeler, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 282 .) Conversely, if the trial court finds the prosecutor's explanation credible and supportive of his or her peremptory challenges independent of group bias, the court must deny the motion as was done here. Once the factual issue is decided, the trial court's disposition of the motion is mandatory, not discretionary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“held that peremptory challenges may not be used to remove prospective jurors solely on the basis of presumed group bias. We defined group bias as a presumption that certain jurors are biased merely because they are members of an identifiable group distinguished on racial, religious, ethnic, or similar grounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reviewing Wheeler rulings, the appellate court must consider whether the trial court has made `a sincere and reasoned determination regarding the genuineness of the prosecutor's reason.' [Citations.] If it appears that the trial court did not actually make such an inquiry, the ruling cannot be upheld.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.