Tepper v. Wilkins’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 27 Cal. 4th 1112 - Zelig v. County of Los Angeles · 31 Cal. 4th 1074 - Schifando v. City of Los Angeles · 25 Cal. 4th 412 - McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc. · 27 Cal. 3d 793 - Carsten v. Psychology Examining Committee · 20 Cal. 4th 23 - Delaney v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest except as otherwise provided by statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.