In re Rhoades’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1996 (American Indian Religious Freedom Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on 9 Cal. 4th 464 - People v. Duvall · 8 Cal. 4th 728 - People v. Romero · 135 S. Ct. 853 - Holt v. Hobbs · United States v. Mitchell · 10 Cal. 4th 447 - In Re Serrano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No government shall impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution ... unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person: (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. 2000cc-1(a) provides:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.