Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 CUSTCT 198 - Swift v. United States

Swift v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 1969
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ricard-Brewster Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think it is well settled by a long line of cases, among which may be cited Spencer, Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 612 , T.D. 41459, Nestle's Food Co., Inc. v. United States, 16 id. 451, T.D. 43199, and United States v. Ricard-Brewster Oil Co., 29 C.C.P.A. 192 , C.A.D., 191, with reference to reasonable regulations made by the Secretary of the Treasury under statutory authority in connection with the exportation of merchandise for benefit of drawback, that such regulations are mandatory and that no oompliance short of actual compliance therewith can be regarded as “sufficient” upon which to base a claim for drawback. * * * [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.