Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 E.H. Smith 316 - Schenck v. . Barnes

10 E.H. Smith 316 - Schenck v. . Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2012 · most notably Anderson v. Wilson (1933), Greenwich Trust Co. v. Tyson (1942)

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 52 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1701898190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSchenck v. Barnes

Relationships

Relies on Baxter v. . McDonnell · Williams v. . Thorn · Graff v. . Bonnett · 7 E.H. Smith 449 - Grannan v. . Westchester Racing Assn. · Pacific National Bank v. Windram

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A trust created by a debtor and under which he is the beneficiary is not affected by the provision of the Revised Statutes (1 R. S. p. 730, § 63) which prohibits a person beneficially interested in a trust for the receipt of the rents and profits of lands from assigning or disposing of the same. “The policy of this statute is clear, when applied to trusts created by third parties, but is without force when the debtor creates the trust.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The statute is obviously designed to assist the creators of trusts in protecting and caring for the beneficiaries who are the natural objects of their solicitude and care, but it cannot be invoked by a debtor to protect a trust which he has created to serve in time of need as a refuge from his creditors.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.