Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.1d 553 - Ehret v. Pierce

Ehret v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

10 F. 553 · 1880

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
September 1932
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1932

2 federal appellate ·

30188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An advertising card devised for ttie purpose of displaying paints of various colors, consisting of a sheet of paper having attached thereto square bits-of paper painted in various colors, each square having a different color, with some lithographic work surrounding the squares advertising the sale, of the-colors, is not the subject of a copyright””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.