Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.1d 669 - Jennings v. Kibbe

Jennings v. Kibbe’s Empirical Analysis

10 F. 669 · 1882

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1980

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3018821890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gorham Company v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Gorham v. White, 14 Wall. 511 [ 20 L. Ed. 731 ], the Supreme Court considered directly the question of identity in regard to a patent for a design. It held that the true test of identity of design is sameness of appearance, in other words, sameness of .effect upon the eye, that it is not necessary that the appearance should be the same to the eye of an expert, and that the test is the eye of an ordinary observer, the eyes of men generally, of observers of ordinary acuteness, bringing to the examination of the article, upon which the design has been placed, that degree of observation which men of ordinary intelligence give.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.