Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.1d 848 - The Thames

The Thames’s Empirical Analysis

10 F. 848 · 1881

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2000
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 13 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2000 · most notably Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc. (1991), Shipping Financial Services Corp. v. Drakos (1998)

8 federal appellate · 13 district ·

901881189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Emily Souder · Ferris v. Bark E. D. Jewett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The distinction between preliminary services leading to a maritime contract, and such contracts themselves, haye been affirmed in this country from the first, and not yet departed from. It furnishes a distinction capable of somewhat easy application. If it be broken down, I do not perceive any other dividing line for excluding from the admiralty many other sorts of claims which have a reference more or less near or remote to navigation and commerce. If the broker of a charter-party be admitted, the insurance broker must follow the drayman, the expressman, and all others who perform services having reference to a voyage either in contemplation or executed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.