Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 F.2d 399

Docket No. 92.

In re Elgot

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1925.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1925-12-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1930

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on In re Elgot

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1925-12-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. •

¶2Joseph G. M. Browne, of New York City, for petitioners.

¶3Epstein & Smith, of New York City (Henry Epstein and Maurice Smith, both of New York City, of counsel), for National Box & Lumber Co.

¶4Paul Englander, of New York City, pro se and for Sheffield Glass Bottle Co.

¶5Before ROGERS, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Order 10 F.(2d) 396, affirmed.

/10/f2d/399 · .json · Public domain