Eggleston v. Wayland’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““It is contended that the equity suit operated as a lis pendens, and was constructive notice to plaintiff of the issues involved therein. We are not impressed by this contention. The deed of trust was not involved in the equity suit, and neither the trustee nor the party secured were parties to that suit. The legal title to the property was in the trustee, and could not be affected by the equity suit, so long as it was not made a party thereto.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. National Permanent Bank, F.S.B. v. Leonard (In Re Leonard)

2. ““Constructive notice by the pendency of the suit extends only to those who derive title from a party or privy....””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. National Permanent Bank, F.S.B. v. Leonard (In Re Leonard)